The Unfinished Oscar Speech

1 MARLON

(Daily Kos | February 26, 2016)

Despising “celebrity” in every Hollywood sense of the word, Marlon Brando used his fame to make statements, bring awareness, and create change. Blatantly against any form of racism, Brando marched in 1963 during the Civil Rights Movement in DC, and often carried his fight for equal rights into his movie roles. In one film, Brando insisted that his air-force pilot character in Sayonara marry the pilot’s Japanese lover at the end. This was in 1957 during a time when America was steeped in Japanese racism. In 1967, Brando was the first leading actor to play, in a sympathetic way, a closeted homosexual military officer in Reflections in a Golden Eye.

But Marlon Brando’s most renowned example of human rights activism took place in 1973 when he forfeited an Oscar for The Godfather in order to bring international awareness to the wrongs being committed against American Indians. After the winner of the category Best Actor was announced, Sacheen Littlefeather went up on stage and spoke on behalf of Marlon Brando. The actress and activist gave a short eloquent and provocative speech which was received by the live audience, and around the world with mixed reactions.

Here is the entire speech (which can also be found here (The New York Times)):

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — For 200 years we have said to the Indian people who are fighting for their land, their life, their families and their right to be free: ”Lay down your arms, my friends, and then we will remain together. Only if you lay down your arms, my friends, can we then talk of peace and come to an agreement which will be good for you.”

When they laid down their arms, we murdered them. We lied to them. We cheated them out of their lands. We starved them into signing fraudulent agreements that we called treaties which we never kept. We turned them into beggars on a continent that gave life for as long as life can remember. And by any interpretation of history, however twisted, we did not do right. We were not lawful nor were we just in what we did. For them, we do not have to restore these people, we do not have to live up to some agreements, because it is given to us by virtue of our power to attack the rights of others, to take their property, to take their lives when they are trying to defend their land and liberty, and to make their virtues a crime and our own vices virtues.

But there is one thing which is beyond the reach of this perversity and that is the tremendous verdict of history. And history will surely judge us. But do we care? What kind of moral schizophrenia is it that allows us to shout at the top of our national voice for all the world to hear that we live up to our commitment when every page of history and when all the thirsty, starving, humiliating days and nights of the last 100 years in the lives of the American Indian contradict that voice?

It would seem that the respect for principle and the love of one’s neighbor have become dysfunctional in this country of ours, and that all we have done, all that we have succeeded in accomplishing with our power is simply annihilating the hopes of the newborn countries in this world, as well as friends and enemies alike, that we’re not humane, and that we do not live up to our agreements.

Perhaps at this moment you are saying to yourself what the hell has all this got to do with the Academy Awards? Why is this woman standing up here, ruining our evening, invading our lives with things that don’t concern us, and that we don’t care about? Wasting our time and money and intruding in our homes.

I think the answer to those unspoken questions is that the motion picture community has been as responsible as any for degrading the Indian and making a mockery of his character, describing his as savage, hostile and evil. It’s hard enough for children to grow up in this world. When Indian children watch television, and they watch films, and when they see their race depicted as they are in films, their minds become injured in ways we can never know.

Recently there have been a few faltering steps to correct this situation, but too faltering and too few, so I, as a member in this profession, do not feel that I can as a citizen of the United States accept an award here tonight. I think awards in this country at this time are inappropriate to be received or given until the condition of the American Indian is drastically altered. If we are not our brother’s keeper, at least let us not be his executioner.

I would have been here tonight to speak to you directly, but I felt that perhaps I could be of better use if I went to Wounded Knee to help forestall in whatever way I can the establishment of a peace which would be dishonorable as long as the rivers shall run and the grass shall grow.

I would hope that those who are listening would not look upon this as a rude intrusion, but as an earnest effort to focus attention on an issue that might very well determine whether or not this country has the right to say from this point forward we believe in the inalienable rights of all people to remain free and independent on lands that have supported their life beyond living memory.

Thank you for your kindness and your courtesy to Miss Littlefeather. Thank you and good night.

This statement was written by Marlon Brando for delivery at the Academy Awards ceremony where Mr. Brando refused an Oscar. The speaker, who read only a part of it, was Shasheen Littlefeather.

It was 29 November, 1864 in Colorado Territory… A Bone-Chilly Dawn Had Just Cracked.

The sun delivered death that morning. My relatives opened their eyes to the sounds of gunfire, howitzer cannons, and spooked horses. They ran for their lives. Mounted soldiers chased them down. The outnumbered Indian men tried to defend themselves and their loved ones with firearms and arrows. Scattering, many women and children escaped up the creek. Mothers found a bend in the river a mile north and hid with their children there. Brothers and sisters, trained not to cry, held each other in silence while their bullet wounds bled.
Unarmed and unsafe, the hiding families were soon found, with nowhere to run. One eyewitness recounts, “As soon as the troops overtook them, they commenced firing on them. They were terribly mutilated, lying there in the water and sand, dead and dying, making many struggles.” The bed of the creek held the bodies of helpless loved ones while ribbons of red floated downstream….
1111111 SANDCREEK

Friends of Pine Ridge Reservation | 2015 Donation Drives for Children, Elders, Veterans and Victims of Violence

Bertha Norton age 101, (cq) gives her great great grandson Joshua Ramirez 16 months, a pinch and a kiss. Bertha is from Maidu and Wintun tribes.  PIcture taken the California State Indian Museum while celebrating "Gathering of Honored Elders". 5/28/00. Sacramento Bee/Bryan Patrick

Bertha Norton age 101, (cq) gives her great great grandson Joshua Ramirez 16 months, a pinch and a kiss |Sacramento Bee/Bryan Patrick

There are many ways you can be a Friend and help our children and elders, victims of violence and schools on Pine Ridge Reservation (and now, the Navajo Reservation). As you will discover, quite a few of them cost little or no money!

Whether you want to recycle an empty toner cartridge, buy a book, socks, toiletries, reading glasses, school supplies or crochet an afghan, you will find a variety of ways to help on these pages, some as simple as saving a soup-can label.

Visit Friends of Pine Ridge Reservation here | Make a Difference

11111 ELDER 11111

Thanksgiving Coming Up and All… | Ask a Slave: What About the Indians?

Cowboys and Injuns, Wild West, and the Middle East as the New, Good Old Frontier

America has never stopped repeating stories about cowboys and Indians, even when the frontier is somewhere else

[… In a sense, the expansion of the frontier into the deserts of the Middle East were foreshadowed even during Geronimo’s own time, when “Wild Arabs” or “Bedouins” were incorporated into displays of trained horsemen at entertainment venues like the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair. Some have argued that these “Wild Arabs” were viewed as Eastern “Rough Riders” which is apparently an old cowboy term for those who ride the most resistant horses. In this case, the adjective “wild” in “Wild Arabs” would simply invoke the idea of the Wild West and therefore serve to relate the skilled Arab horseman to the iconic cowboy figure.

The relationship between cowboys and Middle Eastern horsemen would not have been so jarring at the turn of the 20th century, since the Middle East was mainly imagined through the lens of the Holy Land. While Geronimo was put on display at the 1904 St. Louis world’s fair, one of its other main attractions was a replica of the Holy Land. Geronimo was reportedly courted by a “Wild West” entrepreneur to participate in the same shows as  the “Wild Arabs.” These intersections are not accidental. They demonstrate a long-embedded link between popular understandings of both the frontier and the desert as land to be conquered and people to be turned into dioramas….]

Read the full article hjere: Wild, Wild East | THE NEW INQUIRY

COWBOYS

Discovery of America, White People, and Love for our Earth

When People Mistake Deliberate Media Omissions For Established Social Consciousness | The Case for Redskins, and Matthew McConaughey

In his recent interview with GQ magazine, Matthew McConaughey said:

What interests me is how quickly [the Washington Redskins] got pushed into the social consciousness. We were all fine with it since the 1930s, and all of a sudden we go, ‘No, gotta change it’? It seems like when the first levee breaks, everybody gets on board […] I love the emblem. I dig it. It gives me a little fire and some oomph. But now that it’s in the court of public opinion, it’s going to change. I wish it wouldn’t, but it will.” Read the full interview here | Just Keep McConaugheying – GQ

A common mistake many of us do (often placing judgment within the confinements of our own space, experience, group, “kind”) is confusing deliberate omissions in the mass media -or in our own group- of significant ongoing sociopolitical issues (especially when they refer to minorities or repressed groups like women etc.). These omissions after a while become part of the majority’s consciousness, and then, as Mr. McConaughey pointed out, they indeed become, when they are no longer omitted, a novelty, a rupture if you will, an anomaly in that false consciousness, which is now “unreasonably” and “non-sensically” disturbed.
MC

The Spirits Have a Story to Tell

On the day after Christmas in 1862, 38 Dakota Sioux men were hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history.

152 years later, Kyle Ghostkiller is given the chance to go back in time and save them.

Read the full article here | Pow Wows

Historical background of what led to the execution | Wikipedia

April 1 in US History: The Wampanoag – Pilgrim Treaty of 1621

I read the coverage on the course of events that led to, and the treaty itself on two websites. Firstly came History.com ( The Pilgrim-Wampanoag Peace Treaty of 1621 | History.com ) Then I read the story at the Mashpee Wampanoag website ( Mashpee-Wampanoag Timeline | Wampanoag-Pilgrim Treaty of 1621 )

It was, once again, an experience to remember. And a rewarding lesson on rhetoric.

 

pilgrim

 

 

US Presidents in Their Own Words Concerning American Indians

You may read the entire article from Native News Online here: http://nativenewsonline.net/currents/us-presidents-words-concerning-american-indians/

[…….. It is the fundamental right of every American, as guaranteed by the first amendment of the Constitution, to worship as he or she pleases… This legislation sets forth the policy of the United States to protect and preserve the inherent right of American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, and Native Hawaiian people to believe, express, and exercise their traditional religions,”            — Jimmy Carter

as he signed into law the American Indian Religious Freedom Act.   

“Let me tell you just a little something about the American Indian in our land. We have provided millions of acres of land for what are called preservations – or reservations, I should say. They, from the beginning, announced that they wanted to maintain their way of life, as they had always lived there in the desert and the plains and so forth. And we set up these reservations so they could, and have a Bureau of Indian Affairs to help take care of them. At the same time, we provide education for them – schools on the reservations. And they’re free also to leave the reservations and be American citizens among the rest of us, and many do. Some still prefer, however, that way – that early way of life. And we’ve done everything we can to meet their demands as to how they want to live. Maybe we made a mistake. Maybe we should not have humored them in that wanting to stay in that kind of primitive lifestyle. Maybe we should have said, no, come join us; be citizens along with the rest of us.”       — Ronald Reagan ]